Some edit summary fragments - Edit Overflow v. 1.1.49a158 2021-10-16T122037Z+0

The "How to ... ?" form for a question is not a good one (does not follow QUASM)

Meta information does not belong in a question

Statements like "the above" may make sense on a forum, but definitely not on Stack Exchange.

"its" vs. "it's"

Inappropriate shortening of "IP address"

Capitalisation often obscures the meaning when proper nouns are involved

Code formatting should not be used for emphasis.

Unfortunately, Stack Exchange does not warn when text is enclosed in "<>". It is just ignored and becomes invisible without warning.

Things like "Update", etc. does not belong in the main post (question or answer). A post's current version should be the best possible and there isn't any need to know how it changed over time - this information should be in edit summaries and in the revision history (in some cases, and/or in comments), but definitely not in the main post. Remember, 99% of the users for a post comes from a Google search, and they have no interest whatsoever how a post changed over time - they just need the best content (besides, it is ugly to have "Update" in a post).

It is not necessary to capitalise any words for emphasis. Both Stack Exchange, Wikipedia, Quora, and even YouTube (though very poorly documented - see my blog post about how to reliably style YouTube comments) have facilities for bold and italics. It is mostly Indians that do this, but not at all exclusively. Anyone who has wasted too much time with (raw text-only) forums will have the tendency (and need to unlearn).

Spelling of Stack Overflow, Stack Exchange, and other Stack Exchange sites, etc. No matter how it looks in a logo it is "Stack Overflow" and "Stack Exchange" (the last section - "Proper Use of the Stack Exchange Name"). The only exception is "MathOverflow" (and Jeff Atwood should have said no at the time).

Rhetorical questions do not belong in an answer. One of the reasons is that an answer should not address the OP - most readers (e.g. 99.9999%) will be someone else.

For preemptive use: Responses to comments should normally be by editing the post, not in comments (and it should not contain meta information). Note: The ID in the link must be set.

Some older posts on Stack Overflow have strange syntax highlighting, probably caused by later changes to the Stack Exchange software. Possible code fencing formatting: ```lang-none, ```lang-html, ```lang-php, ```lang-javascript, ```lang-css, ```lang-java, ```lang-csharp, ```lang-vbnet, ```lang-python, ```lang-xml, ```lang-bash

Code-only answers normally need some explanation to be useful.

Run-on sentences (YouTube video). Mostly native speakers (more pronounced for US native speakers), but also for minimum-effort users:

Missing articles, Russians and Indians, "a":

Missing articles, Russians and Indians, "the":

The Indian space (from the outdated 1935 Wren & Martin textbook):

US native speakers, especially southern US, "than" vs. "then":

US native speakers, especially southern US, "you're" vs. "your":

US native speakers, especially southern US, "there" vs. "their" vs. "they're":

US native speakers, especially southern US, "affect" vs. "effect":

US native speakers, especially southern US, "where" vs. "were"vs. "we're":

Space between quantity and unit:

Present simple tense, third person - there must be an 's':

Edit Overflow. Text stuff. Link builder. Fixed strings. Edit summary fragments. Word list. Environment information. HTML validation. HTML validation (no WordPress).